Toponymy as Evidence: How Place-Names Preserve Lost Landscapes

Why names matter

Toponymy—the study of place-names—isn’t just trivia. Names are living records of how people saw, used, and contested a landscape. They often outlast buildings and borders, which makes them powerful “breadcrumbs” for finding what’s been erased, renamed, or simply forgotten. UNGEGN (the UN body for geographic names) treats place-names as part of intangible cultural heritage for exactly this reason: they encode memory, identity, and use over time.

What to look for (pattern → clue → action)

  • Functional names (Mill Creek, Ferry Street, Market Row): signal past infrastructure and flows. Cross-check with historical maps.

  • Linguistic fossils (loanwords and suffixes): In England, -chester/-caster/-cester (< castra, Roman fort) can flag Roman military sites; pair with road alignments labeled street/strēt (Roman road).

  • Archaeological generics: In the Levant, tell/tel in a name often indicates a settlement mound—an urban palimpsest in 3D.

  • Hydronyms and relief terms: wadi, arroyo, glen, run can reveal buried or culverted watercourses and routes along easiest terrain.

  • Honorifics & erasures: Sudden switches from Indigenous or descriptive names to commemoratives can indicate political rewriting; track what was there before and who advocated the change. For U.S. features, the BGN (federal naming authority) documents proposals and decisions.

A field-friendly workflow (phone + free tools)

  1. Seed names from gazetteers

    • GNIS (U.S.) for official + historical variants; export candidates for a study area.

    • GeoNames (global) to surface multilingual/alternate forms; helpful where colonial and local names diverge.

    • OSM Nominatim to query names by keyword and pull alternates (e.g., namedetails=1).

  2. Sort by “signal strength”
    Tag each name as function, material, agent, event, or memory. Add “language/source” (e.g., Latin loan, Arabic generic, Indigenous term) and confidence.

  3. Map + overlay
    Drop candidates into your existing Map Regression workflow; compare against historic sheets (Sanborns, cadastral, early USGS topos). Prioritize places where names cluster with visible anomalies (ghost blocks, redirected streets, culverted creeks).

  4. Ground-truth (lightweight)
    Use street-level imagery and museum/site reports. For “tell/tel” or “—chester” clusters, check for known sites or scheduling records before any field visit.

  5. Ethics & names
    Names carry living meaning. Where Indigenous toponyms exist (or are being restored), center them—and cite appropriately. Canada’s national toponymy program, for example, documents tens of thousands of Indigenous names and active restoration efforts; similar work is growing worldwide under UNGEGN.

Mini case-study templates (drop-in blocks)

Template A: Functional → Feature

  • Clue: “Ferry Street” + “Landing Lane” + “Old Mill Road.”

  • Hypothesis: Historic river crossing + power mill headrace.

  • Check: GNIS/GeoNames variants; early topo contours for cutbanks; Sanborn for industrial symbols.

  • Outcome: Map likely crossing; link to current access/ethics.

Template B: Linguistic fossil → Settlement form

  • Clue: Parish names ending in “—chester,” adjacent “Street.”

  • Hypothesis: Roman fort with axial road preserved as property lines.

  • Check: KEPN entry for etymology; overlay Roman road reconstructions; museum catalog of finds.

Template C: Archaeological generic → Palimpsest mound

  • Clue: “Tell el-X / Tel Y.”

  • Hypothesis: Multi-phase settlement mound with encircling tracks.

  • Check: Satellite relief + references on “tell” sites; national antiquities register.

Common pitfalls (and how to dodge them)

  • False friends. Not every “—ford” marks a ford; sometimes it’s a family name. Cross-validate with hydrology and earliest attestations (local place-name dictionaries or university projects like KEPN).

  • Over-reliance on one gazetteer. GNIS is authoritative for U.S. federal usage; GeoNames/OSM surface alternates and vernacular forms. Use all three for triangulation.

  • Ethical blind spots. If a name is contested or derogatory, consult current renaming guidance and local communities before using it in itineraries or products. (BGN explains proposal steps; NATHPO/Wilderness Society provide a practical guide for U.S. contexts.)

Quickstart: your “Place-Name Clue Log”

Create a simple table with columns: Name · Language/Element · Type (function/material/agent/event/memory) · Earliest Attestation · Gazetteer Source(s) · Map Evidence · Notes/Next Step.

Use it alongside your Map Regression CSV so readers can replicate your process in the next post.



Further reading & tools

  • UNGEGN chapters on names as cultural heritage (concept + methods). UNSD

  • GNIS Domestic Names search + training videos (U.S.).

  • GeoNames (global) and OSM Nominatim (API docs) for alternates. Nominatim

  • Indigenous naming overviews and handbooks (Canada) to understand living significance. Natural Resources Canada


Previous
Previous

Phone-First Photogrammetry: Build a 3D Site Model with Your Smartphone

Next
Next

Map Regression 101: How to Find “Lost” Places Using Historic Maps